<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>robertdot.org</title>
  <link>http://robertdot.org</link>
  <description>The Complete Robertdot Blog Feed.</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:03:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Custom script based on LiveJournal RSS feed</generator>
  <item>
   <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://robertdot.org/2007/03/08/html-5-whatwg-versus-w3c.html</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
   <title>HTML 5: WHATWG versus W3C</title>
   <link>http://robertdot.org/2007/03/08/html-5-whatwg-versus-w3c.html</link>
   <author>Robert &lt;rss@robertdot.org&gt;</author>
   <description><![CDATA[
    <p>
     Tags:
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/geek.html" rel="tag">Geek</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/html.html" rel="tag">HTML</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/w3c.html" rel="tag">W3C</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/web-standards.html" rel="tag">Web Standards</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/whatwg.html" rel="tag">WHATWG</a> 
    </p>
    <p>
     The new <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym> <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> working group launched.  The charter states that they'll attempt convergence with the <acronym title="Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group">WHATWG</acronym>'s recommendation.  I remain a little confused with how the browser vendors will handle this.
    </p>
    <p>
     Continue Reading &#34;HTML 5: WHATWG versus W3C&#34; on <a href="http://robertdot.org/2007/03/08/html-5-whatwg-versus-w3c.html">Robertdot</a>,  <a href="http://robertdot.livejournal.com/9699.html" rel="nofollow">LiveJournal</a>, or <a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;friendID=18355253&amp;blogID=238747854" rel="nofollow">MySpace</a>&hellip;
    </p>
    ]]></description>
   <comments>http://robertdot.org/2007/03/08/html-5-whatwg-versus-w3c.html</comments>
  </item>
  <item>
   <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://robertdot.org/2006/11/19/the-great-acronym-title-multipurpose-internet-mail-extensions-mime-acronym-type-swindle.html</guid>
   <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
   <title>The Great <acronym title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions">MIME</acronym>-Type Swindle</title>
   <link>http://robertdot.org/2006/11/19/the-great-acronym-title-multipurpose-internet-mail-extensions-mime-acronym-type-swindle.html</link>
   <author>Robert &lt;rss@robertdot.org&gt;</author>
   <description><![CDATA[
    <p>
     Tags:
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/geek.html" rel="tag">Geek</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/html.html" rel="tag">HTML</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/w3c.html" rel="tag">W3C</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/web-design.html" rel="tag">Web Design</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/web-standards.html" rel="tag">Web Standards</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/xhtml.html" rel="tag">XHTML</a> 
    </p>
    <p>
     It's a really old subject, but I haven't said my piece on the <acronym title="Extensible HyperText Markup Language">XHTML</acronym> 1.0 versus <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> 4.01 debate.  While commenting on Roger Johansson's blog, 456 Berea Street, I said a little bit about what I think.  I figured I ought to go ahead and say my fill.
    </p>
    <p>
     Continue Reading &#34;The Great <acronym title="Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions">MIME</acronym>-Type Swindle&#34; on <a href="http://robertdot.org/2006/11/19/the-great-acronym-title-multipurpose-internet-mail-extensions-mime-acronym-type-swindle.html">Robertdot</a>,  <a href="http://robertdot.livejournal.com/7489.html" rel="nofollow">LiveJournal</a>, or <a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;friendID=18355253&amp;blogID=195182391" rel="nofollow">MySpace</a>&hellip;
    </p>
    ]]></description>
   <comments>http://robertdot.org/2006/11/19/the-great-acronym-title-multipurpose-internet-mail-extensions-mime-acronym-type-swindle.html</comments>
  </item>
  <item>
   <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://robertdot.org/2006/10/28/w3c-listens-incremental-update-to-html-on-the-way.html</guid>
   <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
   <title>W3C Listens, Incremental Update to HTML On The Way</title>
   <link>http://robertdot.org/2006/10/28/w3c-listens-incremental-update-to-html-on-the-way.html</link>
   <author>Robert &lt;rss@robertdot.org&gt;</author>
   <description><![CDATA[
    <p>
     Tags:
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/geek.html" rel="tag">Geek</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/html.html" rel="tag">HTML</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/w3c.html" rel="tag">W3C</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/web-design.html" rel="tag">Web Design</a>,  
     <a href="http://robertdot.org/tags/web-standards.html" rel="tag">Web Standards</a> 
    </p>
    <p>
     Surprisingly, SlashDot scooped all the web design websites I normally read on Tim Berners-Lee's announcement that <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> will be incrementally updated (as well as things such as the <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym>'s HTML validator)
    </p>
    <p>
     Continue Reading &#34;W3C Listens, Incremental Update to HTML On The Way&#34; on <a href="http://robertdot.org/2006/10/28/w3c-listens-incremental-update-to-html-on-the-way.html">Robertdot</a>,  <a href="http://robertdot.livejournal.com/6012.html" rel="nofollow">LiveJournal</a>, or <a href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;friendID=18355253&amp;blogID=185995123" rel="nofollow">MySpace</a>&hellip;
    </p>
    ]]></description>
   <comments>http://robertdot.org/2006/10/28/w3c-listens-incremental-update-to-html-on-the-way.html</comments>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>